You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
There's a "new" review of BA up at Janesguide... but even though it's dated 11/13/2006, it appears to be a repost of the same (glowing, naturally) review they posted sometime back. I guess it's got to be a Good Thing... but I can't help wondering why they're reposting old reviews of BA when they still haven't (AFAIK) gotten around to reviewing IFM. Oh, well... I never claimed to understand this business.
Offline
Pages: 1